NEW<\/span>You can now listen to Fox News articles!\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n The White House on Friday proposed a sweeping fiscal year 2027 budget that would dramatically increase military spending<\/a> to roughly $1.5 trillion while cutting billions from domestic programs, marking a sharp shift in federal priorities toward national security and border enforcement.<\/p>\n The proposal outlines roughly $1.5 trillion in<\/a> total defense resources, a figure the administration says is needed to address growing threats from China, Russia and other adversaries.<\/p>\n The request includes about $1.1 trillion in base discretionary funding for the Department of War, along with an additional $350 billion in mandatory funding to support priorities such as munitions production and expansion of the defense industrial base.<\/p>\n TRUMP REWRITES NATIONAL SECURITY PLAYBOOK AS MASS MIGRATION OVERTAKES TERRORISM AS TOP US THREAT<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n If enacted, the plan would represent one of the largest increases in U.S. defense spending in decades, though the total includes a mix of discretionary funding and mandatory resources that are not typically combined in standard Pentagon budget comparisons.<\/p>\n The White House on Friday proposed a sweeping fiscal year 2027 budget that would dramatically increase military spending to roughly $1.5 trillion while cutting billions from domestic programs, marking a sharp shift in federal priorities toward national security and border enforcement.<\/span> (AP photo)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The budget places heavy emphasis on rebuilding weapons stockpiles and strengthening domestic manufacturing capacity, areas that defense officials have identified as key vulnerabilities in recent years.<\/p>\n It calls for accelerated procurement of critical munitions and expanded investments in the defense industrial base, alongside increased funding for nuclear modernization.<\/p>\n Shipbuilding is another major focus, with $65.8 billion requested to procure 18 Navy battle force ships and 16 non-battle force vessels as part of a broader effort to expand maritime capacity.<\/p>\n The proposal also continues funding for the “Golden Dome” missile defense system, which aims to develop a layered homeland defense using space-based sensors and interceptors.<\/p>\n Emerging technologies play a central role in the plan.\u00a0<\/p>\n The budget highlights investments in artificial intelligence, drones and counter-drone systems, and next-generation aircraft, including continued development of the F-47 \u2014 a sixth-generation fighter designed to operate alongside autonomous systems \u2014 with the program targeting a first flight as early as 2028.<\/p>\n The proposal also continues funding for the “Golden Dome” missile defense system, which aims to develop a layered homeland defense using space-based sensors and interceptors.<\/span> (Chip Somodevilla\/Getty Images)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n TRUMP NATIONAL SECURITY BLUEPRINT DECLARES \u2018ERA OF MASS MIGRATION IS OVER,’ TARGETS CHINA\u2019S RISE<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n The increase in defense spending is paired with a proposed 10% reduction in nondefense discretionary spending.<\/p>\n Budget tables show nondefense funding dropping to about $660 billion, while defense-related funding rises significantly, with base defense funding reaching roughly $1.15 trillion.\u00a0<\/p>\n The fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act<\/a> (NDAA) authorized approximately $890 billion to $901 billion in defense spending.\u00a0<\/p>\n The administration also is proposing continued reductions in nondefense spending in future years, signaling a longer-term effort to rebalance federal spending toward national security priorities.<\/p>\n Several major agencies would see significant reductions under the plan, including: NASA, cut by about $5.6 billion, or 23%, State Department and international programs, down roughly $15.5 billion, or 30%, Environmental Protection Agency, cut by more than half, Department of Labor, reduced by about $3.5 billion and Department of Housing and Urban Development, down $10.7 billion.<\/p>\n The reductions are likely to face pushback from lawmakers, particularly over cuts to scientific research, housing programs and foreign aid.<\/p>\n “Donald Trump\u2019s budget is rotten to the core, and Democrats will make sure it never passes,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement. “Trump is already spending massive sums on never-ending wars abroad, and now he\u2019s pushing for a record-breaking $1.5 trillion in defense spending while slashing programs that Americans and seniors care about and rely on.”<\/p>\n Several major agencies would see significant reductions under the plan, including NASA, cut by about $5.6 billion.<\/span> (Austin DeSisto\/NurPhoto via Getty Images)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The budget also increases funding tied to immigration enforcement and domestic security.<\/p>\n The Department of Homeland Security would continue to rely on more than $190 billion in multiyear funding provided through prior legislation to support border wall construction, detention capacity and enforcement operations, including tens of thousands of detention beds.<\/p>\n PENTAGON SEEKS AT LEAST $200B FROM CONGRESS FOR IRAN WAR<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n At the same time, the Department of Justice would receive $40.8 billion in discretionary funding, a 13% increase, with additional resources aimed at addressing violent crime, drug trafficking and cartel activity.<\/p>\n The proposal also includes continued support for military involvement in border operations<\/a>, as well as expanded funding for the Coast Guard.<\/p>\n The budget proposes a roughly 30% reduction in funding for the State Department and international programs, including cuts to humanitarian aid, global health initiatives and contributions to international organizations.<\/p>\n At the same time, it creates a new $5 billion fund intended to support strategic partnerships and national security priorities, along with expanded financing for allied nations purchasing U.S. defense equipment.<\/p>\n The changes reflect a broader shift toward prioritizing security-focused spending over traditional foreign assistance programs.<\/p>\n Beyond military spending, the budget links national security more directly to economic and industrial policy.<\/p>\n It includes funding to expand domestic production of critical minerals and support supply chains, alongside investments in advanced computing, including artificial intelligence supercomputers at national laboratories.<\/p>\n Officials say those efforts are intended to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers and improve the United States\u2019 ability to sustain long-term competition with adversaries.<\/p>\n The budget is based on projections that assume steady economic growth of about 3% annually and inflation stabilizing near 2%, estimates that could face scrutiny from outside analysts.<\/p>\n The proposal now moves to Congress, where it is expected to face significant debate over both the scale of defense spending and the extent of domestic cuts.<\/p>\n![\"President](\"https:\/\/a57.foxnews.com\/static.foxnews.com\/foxnews.com\/content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1200\/675\/president-donald-trump-farmers-white-house-fox-news-002.jpg?ve=1&tl=1\")
<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>\nWeapons production, ships and emerging technologies<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"Secretary](\"https:\/\/a57.foxnews.com\/static.foxnews.com\/foxnews.com\/content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/1200\/675\/hegseth-golden-dome.png?ve=1&tl=1\")
<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>\nDefense increases paired with domestic cuts<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/a57.foxnews.com\/static.foxnews.com\/foxnews.com\/content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/1200\/675\/nasa-launch.jpg?ve=1&tl=1\")
<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>\nBorder security and law enforcement funding expands<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Foreign aid reduced as priorities shift<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Industrial policy tied to national security<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Economic assumptions and next steps<\/strong><\/h2>\n