\n<\/p>\n
Days after the Taliban swept to power in 2021, Pakistan\u2019s then spymaster appeared in Kabul on what looked to many like a victory lap. Sipping tea in the lobby of the Afghan capital\u2019s fanciest hotel, Lt Gen Faiz Hameed told reporters: \u201cDon\u2019t worry, everything will be OK.\u201d<\/p>\n
This week it became clear just how badly Pakistan had miscalculated how it could rely on the Taliban, as Islamabad unleashed airstrikes in Afghanistan<\/a> and troops from both countries fought each other on the border.<\/p>\n Pakistan\u2019s defence minister, Khawaja Muhammad Asif, said patience had finally run out after calling repeatedly on the Taliban<\/a> to stop Pakistani militants from using Afghan territory as a sanctuary from which to attack.<\/p>\n Pakistan\u2019s predicament is the mirror opposite of accusations made by the US-led international coalition in Afghanistan<\/a> against Pakistan before 2021: that the Taliban were being allowed to use Pakistan as a safe haven.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is blowback, big time,\u201d said Kamran Bokhari, a senior director at the Washington-based New Lines Institute thinktank. \u201cIf you support proxies who challenge your own national identity and your national narrative, they don\u2019t think that you\u2019re ideologically legitimate, then it is only a matter of time before they turn their guns on you.\u201d<\/p>\n In 2011, Hillary Clinton as US secretary of state had put it bluntly when visiting Pakistan: \u201cYou can\u2019t keep snakes in your back yard and expect them only to bite your neighbours.\u201d<\/p>\n Bokhari said Afghanistan was not Pakistan\u2019s only problem on its western flank, with a weakening Iran set to ignite trouble on that border, and Tehran no longer in a position to help Pakistan manage the Taliban.<\/p>\n The Taliban deny that their territory is being used against Pakistan and on Friday they again implored Islamabad to enter into negotiations with the militant group behind many of the attacks, known as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).<\/p>\n The TTP emerged in 2007 and waged terror across Pakistan for a decade, but it had weakened in the years before the Taliban took Kabul. Since then there has been a surge in attacks in Pakistan.<\/p>\n The Taliban and the TTP fought together against international forces in Afghanistan, and the TTP had hosted its jihadi brothers in Pakistan. With the Taliban in power, it was payback time for the TTP.<\/p>\n The TTP says it is seeking to impose its own extreme version of Islam on Pakistan, where 95% of the population is Muslim and the constitution stipulates that all laws have to be in line with Islam.<\/p>\n Pakistan says it has been forced to make tough choices over decades of instability in Afghanistan. After the 9\/11 attacks and the US invasion of Afghanistan, Islamabad became alarmed at what it perceived as the influence of its arch-enemy India on the Afghan government.<\/p>\n Pakistan sought a more friendly Afghanistan and the Taliban were seen as the only viable option, analysts say, though Islamabad formally remained a close American ally.<\/p>\n That US alliance ignited a radical reaction at home, led by the TTP, which was behind the assassination of the former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, the massacre of more than 130 children at a school, and the taking of territory including the Swat valley, where they shot the schoolgirl Malala Yousafzai<\/a>.<\/p>\n The Pakistan military\u2019s bet was that the Afghan insurgents were \u201cgood\u201d jihadists, separate in nature from the \u201cbad\u201d Pakistani insurgents they were fighting. That distinction between the two movements, always shaky, has become increasingly blurred as many Taliban members have joined the TTP now that there is no jihad to fight inside Afghanistan.<\/p>\n Mosharraf Zaidi, a spokesperson for Pakistan\u2019s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, said: \u201cIt is ludicrous and disingenuous for any honest broker to argue that this is a comeuppance for Pakistan, given that the current position of Pakistan is the same as it has always been: stop supporting terrorism in Pakistan.\u201d<\/p>\n Antonio Giustozzi, a senior research fellow at London\u2019s Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), said Pakistan\u2019s strategy was to inflict pain on Afghanistan through airstrikes and an economic blockade, to compel a change in approach or replacement of the leader, Haibatullah Akhundzada.<\/p>\n \u201cBombing Afghanistan was a mistake as Haibatullah had to retaliate or lose credibility,\u201d Giustozzi said. \u201cThere\u2019s been a wave of nationalism in Afghanistan that\u2019s made Haibatullah stronger.\u201d<\/p>\n The Taliban have turned so far against Pakistan that they are also supporting a secular Pakistani insurgency that is seeking to separate the country\u2019s natural resources-rich province of Balochistan, Giustozzi said.<\/p>\n The TTP has been led in recent years by Noor Wali Mehsud, who has managed to unite its squabbling factions and pursue a new strategy where it focuses its attacks on the army and the police rather than civilians.<\/p>\n Asif Durrani, formerly Pakistan\u2019s special envoy for Afghanistan, said the Taliban were told to choose between Pakistan and the TTP and they went for the latter.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Taliban are part of a war economy,\u201d Durrani said. \u201cThey are not behaving like a government, they are still in militant mode.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n