{"id":7215,"date":"2026-02-28T07:16:46","date_gmt":"2026-02-28T07:16:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/?p=7215"},"modified":"2026-02-28T07:16:46","modified_gmt":"2026-02-28T07:16:46","slug":"unripe-septics-unripe-commandments-and-technological-advances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/?p=7215","title":{"rendered":"Unripe Septics, Unripe Commandments, and Technological Advances"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Please enjoy the latest edition of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/ij.org\/about-us\/shortcircuit\/\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=http:\/\/ij.org\/about-us\/shortcircuit\/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1535766719490000&amp;usg=AFQjCNEM-nqsD8DW67r50PJye6ZvnENsIg\" data-mrf-link=\"http:\/\/ij.org\/about-us\/shortcircuit\/\">Short Circuit<\/a>, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice.<\/p>\n<p>Victory! This week, <a href=\"https:\/\/ij.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Peterson-v.-Newton.pdf\">S.D. Iowa<\/a> rejected a mayor and police chief&#8217;s invocations of qualified immunity (and the Nuremberg defense) and handed a big win on the merits to our client, who was arrested, jailed, and criminally prosecuted for criticizing them. Good stuff. <a href=\"https:\/\/ij.org\/press-release\/vindicated-court-rebukes-newton-iowa-officials-for-retaliatory-arrests-after-citizen-called-them-fascists\/\">Click here<\/a> to learn more.<\/p>\n<p>New on the <a href=\"https:\/\/ij.org\/podcasts\/short-circuit\/short-circuit-417-settling-with-spicy-chicken\/\">Short Circuit podcast<\/a>: To fuel the nightmares of our lawyer listeners, a story of a settlement that was until it wasn&#8217;t, powered by litigation financing.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>After news reports indicate that ICE planned to request immigrants&#8217; addresses from the IRS to aid immigration enforcement, immigrant-rights groups sue to enjoin the information sharing. <a href=\"https:\/\/media.cadc.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/docs\/2026\/02\/25-5181-2160705.pdf\">D.C. Circuit<\/a>: But the statute that prohibits release of &#8220;taxpayer return information&#8221; exempts addresses. Injunction denied.<span id=\"more-8370505\"\/><\/li>\n<li>Allegation: Cargo pilot who is stuck in Vietnam for reasons outside his control gets pinged by his employer for a same-day, FAA-mandated random drug test in Seattle. Employer: And since you &#8220;refused&#8221; to take the test, you&#8217;re fired. Feds: And you can&#8217;t do any piloting until after rehab. <a href=\"https:\/\/media.cadc.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/docs\/2026\/02\/24-1348-2161353.pdf\">D.C. Circuit<\/a>: The feds&#8217; argument that the FAA need not or cannot review the employer&#8217;s test-refusal determination raises serious constitutional concerns under the private nondelegation doctrine, but this goes back for a rethink for other reasons.<\/li>\n<li>Without a warrant, officers search a home owned by a North Carolina man on probation, they find drugs and money, and then the gov&#8217;t seeks to civilly forfeit the cash. Uh oh! The probationer lived elsewhere, he leased the searched home to his girlfriend, and she did not consent to a search. Does the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s warrant exception for searches of probationers extend to property they&#8217;ve leased to others? <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca4.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/237280.P.pdf\">Fourth Circuit<\/a>: Nope. The search was illegal, and evidence it yielded must be suppressed. Return the money!<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca4.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/251121.U.pdf\">Fourth Circuit<\/a> (unpublished): Sure, the county&#8217;s water and sewer plan forbids you from building a well on your property, and county employees told you you&#8217;re not eligible for a waiver that would let you build a well on your property, but the county hasn&#8217;t told you you&#8217;re not allowed to build a well on your property until you ask the County Council to change the law and let you build a well on your property and then they say no.<\/li>\n<li>Louisiana law requires that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every classroom. A First Amendment violation? <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca5.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/pub\/24\/24-30706-CV1.pdf\">Fifth Circuit<\/a> (en banc): No need to decide that because the case isn&#8217;t ripe. (If that&#8217;s too boring for you, feel free to enjoy Judge Ho&#8217;s concurrence, which would have reached the merits, or any of the four (4) dissents.)<\/li>\n<li>Man is arrested in Greenville, Miss. for allegedly stealing a car. Investigators search his phone <em>sans <\/em>warrant, discover evidence of purchases with a stolen debit card 150 miles away in Southaven. They call the Southaven police and share the information, saying they had a warrant for the search. Southaven police arrest him based on the info. Once charges are dropped, he sues. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca5.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/pub\/24\/24-60379-CV0.pdf\">Fifth Circuit<\/a>: Qualified immunity. It was clearly established at the time that a Fourth Amendment search occurs when an officer looks at material from a phone, but there&#8217;s no case about second-hand viewings of material from a phone.<\/li>\n<li>Owner of Ohio-based trucking company applies for a small-business grant advertised by his insurance company, Progressive. He abandons his application upon learning that only black-owned businesses are eligible (he is white), then sues for racial discrimination. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/26a0052p-06.pdf\">Sixth Circuit<\/a>: He does not have standing because he was welcome to apply, and who&#8217;s to know if they would have ultimately discriminated against him in issuing the grants? Dissent: That is not how anti-discrimination law has ever worked.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/ij.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Chancellor-brief.pdf\">Allegation<\/a>: Detroit officer lied on search warrant application and lied on witness stand, resulting in man spending more than seven years in prison for cocaine that he did not deal. (He&#8217;s released early after conviction integrity unit finds it can&#8217;t verify the officer&#8217;s testimony, for instance, whether the confidential informant actually existed.) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/26a0053p-06.pdf\">Sixth Circuit<\/a>: But officers have absolute immunity for lying on the stand, and the search warrant was for the man&#8217;s mother&#8217;s house\u2014where he disclaims a privacy interest. So you had to show the officer was lying at some other point in the process, which you didn&#8217;t argue.<\/li>\n<li>When warden and investigator at Illinois women&#8217;s prison learn that a prison counselor is sexually assaulting an inmate, they devise a shambolic plan: using the victim as unwitting bait, in the hopes that the investigator could hide in a drop ceiling and then leap out and catch the counselor in the act. Except that the counselor had nearly 24\/7 access to the victim, and the investigator kept scrupulous bankers&#8217; hours. More sexual assault ensues. <a href=\"https:\/\/media.ca7.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/OpinionsWeb\/processWebInputExternal.pl?Submit=Display&amp;Path=Y2026\/D02-26\/C:24-1696:J:Hamilton:aut:T:fnOp:N:3499566:S:0\">Seventh Circuit<\/a>: The warden and the investigator are definitely liable for these obvious Eighth Amendment violations. But only for the period they were executing their preposterous rape-bait plan, not before. Given that distinction\u2014which was muddied a bit at trial\u2014they get a new trial on damages.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/26\/02\/252126U.pdf\">Eighth Circuit<\/a> (unpublished): This Arkansas state judge abused his office for sexual gratification and lied to the FBI, but we&#8217;ll &#8220;spare [him] the indignity&#8221; of going through the details. Short Circuit (<a href=\"https:\/\/arkansasadvocate.com\/2025\/05\/20\/former-arkansas-district-judge-sentenced-to-2-years-in-federal-prison\/\">lacking such scruples<\/a>): Real piece of work, this guy.<\/li>\n<li>Without warning, Des Moines, Iowa officer sets canine on murder suspect who&#8217;d jumped off a roof and was trying to flee on foot. The dog bites the suspect for 15 seconds until he&#8217;s cuffed. <a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/26\/02\/243383P.pdf\">Eighth Circuit<\/a>: Gotta give a warning. To trial this must go.<\/li>\n<li>Under a delegation of authority that Congress blissfully bestowed unto the Presidency long long ago, the holder of that office can de-unionize many swaths of the federal gov&#8217;t if the swaths kinda relate to national security. The current holder of the office so de-unionized in March 2025 and along the way mentioned that the unions were saying mean things about him. District court: First Amendment retaliation! <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2026\/02\/26\/25-4014.pdf\">Ninth Circuit<\/a>: He was gonna do that stuff anyway. Concurrence: But this is just a preliminary injunction and, who knows, new facts may come to light.<\/li>\n<li>Federal law creates a civil cause of action for victims of human trafficking against companies that benefit from the trafficking. Victims of trafficking sue American seafood importer but lose because the importer merely <em>attempted <\/em>to benefit but didn&#8217;t succeed. Congress responds by clarifying the law to explicitly cover attempt. Is the change retroactive? <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2026\/02\/20\/23-55299.pdf\">Ninth Circuit<\/a> (en banc): Indeed it is.<\/li>\n<li>In July 2021, fifty people attended a housing-rights march in Colorado Springs. Afterward, police obtained warrants for data from a protestor who allegedly pushed her bike in front of a running police officer and a nonprofit that helped organize the event. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca10.uscourts.gov\/sites\/ca10\/files\/opinions\/010111390292.pdf\">Tenth Circuit<\/a>: Officers can&#8217;t just search everything related to someone they suspect committed a crime. These warrants were insanely overbroad, lacking any limiting principle. No qualified immunity on those Fourth Amendment claims. Dissent: Our caselaw hasn&#8217;t kept up with technological advances, so reasonable officers\u2014and judges\u2014could disagree about how to apply 18th-century concepts to digital data.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>New case: IJ client Fernando &#8220;Fernie&#8221; Madrid served Apache County, Ariz. for decades as a teacher, assistant principal, and principal. But when he decided to run for superintendent of schools, the county attorney\u2014who happens to be married to the incumbent superintendent\u2014launched a campaign of harassment against him, including physical assault in the street, an anonymous package containing threats dropped off at Fernie&#8217;s home (turns out the shipping was paid for with the county attorney&#8217;s credit card), and more. This week, Fernie joined with IJ to file a First Amendment suit against the now-former county attorney, his two villainous henchmen, and the county. <a href=\"https:\/\/ij.org\/press-release\/arizona-educator-sues-county-attorney-whose-hired-thugs-bullied-him-out-of-election-campaign\/\">Click here<\/a> to learn more.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/volokh\/2026\/02\/27\/unripe-septics-unripe-commandments-and-technological-advances\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Please enjoy the latest edition of\u00a0Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. Victory! This week, S.D. Iowa&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7215\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foreignnewstoday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}