Sunday, March 8, 2026
Home SportsMen’s Bubble Watch: Tracking which teams will make (or miss) the NCAA tournament

Men’s Bubble Watch: Tracking which teams will make (or miss) the NCAA tournament

by admin7
0 comments


The 2026 men’s NCAA tournament is rapidly approaching, which means the question top of mind for many fans is: Will your team be in or out? With roughly a week until Selection Sunday, we’re tracking how each team on the “bubble” of the bracket is trending.

We’ll use a variety of metrics as guides, classifying teams based on how likely they are to make the field of 68 as one of the 37 at-large selections — conditional on not winning their respective conference tournaments for one of the 31 automatic qualifying bids (AQs). To that end, we’ll use Joe Lunardi’s Bracketology projections and a combination of data sources — including my forecast-model consensus and NCAA résumé metrics such as NET rankings that the selection committee will evaluate — to judge a team’s underlying potential. (For a full glossary of terms and sources, click here or scroll to the bottom of this story.)

We’ll sort teams in at-large contention into the following categories:

  • Locks: Teams that have nearly a 100% chance to be called by the committee as an at-large selection (if necessary). They would need a significant change in momentum to miss the cut. 29 current teams

  • Should be in: Teams tracking safely above the cutline (generally 75% consensus at-large odds or better), but not immune to trouble. Most likely, these teams should hear their names called on March 15, though their fates are not yet assured. 14 current teams

  • Work to do: Teams whose upcoming results will meaningfully change their fate (for good or bad). These are the truest “on the bubble” teams, because their chances are closest to a coin flip, though their consensus at-large odds may be as low as 10%. 11 current teams

Teams beyond these categories have very slim chances to make the Big Dance without winning their conference tournament.

Now let’s go conference by conference — in order of which project to have the most NCAA tournament bids — to rank the teams in each category based on their chances to secure an at-large bid.

Note: All times Eastern.

Jump to a conference:
SEC | Big Ten | ACC
Big 12 | Big East
Mid-majors

SEC

9.8 expected bids (8.8 at-large)

Locks (7)

Florida Gators
Alabama Crimson Tide
Arkansas Razorbacks
Vanderbilt Commodores
Tennessee Volunteers

Georgia Bulldogs
Kentucky Wildcats

Should be in (3)

Texas Longhorns

Updated: March 4, 9:10 p.m.

After adding a key road win over bubble rival Texas A&M on Saturday, Texas’ momentum was slowed with a lopsided loss at Arkansas on Wednesday. The Longhorns have seven Quadrant 1 wins on the season — more than Georgia, Missouri, Texas A&M or Auburn (or even Tennessee) — so the consensus forecast still sets their at-large chances at 77%, way up from 45% at a certain point last month. And at No. 9 in the overall SEC résumé rankings, they are still in a solid position; teams with similar résumés to Texas have made the tournament in the past, per advanced analytics site Bart Torvik.

Next game: vs. Oklahoma (Saturday)


Texas A&M Aggies

Updated: March 7, 8:51 p.m.

Margins can be razor-thin on the bubble at this time of year, as illustrated by the former “work to do” Aggies. Their odds would have dropped into the 60% range with a loss in triple-overtime at LSU Saturday but instead rose to 80% — and got them promoted up — with the marathon win. Bucky McMillan’s squad is still not exactly a “lock,” but six Quadrant 1 victories and ranking top 10 among SEC teams in our résumé rating (low-40s nationally) give A&M a leg up on other SEC bubble hopefuls heading into the SEC tournament.

Next game: SEC tournament (March 11-15)


Missouri Tigers

Updated: March 7, 2:37 p.m.

Coming off a hot stretch of six victories in eight games, the Tigers lost back-to-back contests at Oklahoma and at home against Arkansas to close the SEC regular season. At 74% in the at-large odds, they’re a bit less safe than they seemed a few games ago, though they entered Saturday tied for eighth among SEC teams in the résumé average (and in the mid-40s nationally) — a favorable spot in a projected 10- or 11-bid league. If it comes down to in-conference comparisons, the Tigers have five Quadrant 1 wins and a much better record than a team such as Auburn (20-11 vs. 16-14), even if it’s against a much easier schedule (63rd hardest vs. fifth). That still ought to help them going into the conference tourney.

Next game: SEC tournament (March 11-15)

Work to do (1)

Auburn Tigers

Updated: March 3, 11:59 p.m.

The Tigers desperately needed a win after losing seven of their previous eight games, and they finally got it against LSU on Tuesday. They have an interesting case for the committee, but have all but run out of wiggle room: Though they have five Quadrant 1 wins against the nation’s fifth-most difficult schedule per the BPI, and are borderline top 40 in the national résumé ranking average, their 14 losses are by far the most among the SEC bubble tier. Teams with résumés most similar to Auburn have tended to miss out on an at-large bid more often than not, per Bart Torvik, which explains why the Tigers’ consensus chances hover in the mid 30% range ahead of their regular-season finale.

Next game: at Alabama (Saturday)

BIG TEN

9.5 expected bids; 8.5 at-large

Locks (6)

Michigan Wolverines
Illinois Fighting Illini
Purdue Boilermakers
Michigan State Spartans
Nebraska Cornhuskers
Wisconsin Badgers

Should be in (3)

UCLA Bruins

Updated: March 4, 8:31 a.m.

Following Saturday’s loss at Minnesota, Mick Cronin’s team picked up its most impressive win of the season Tuesday night, beating No. 9 Nebraska by 20 in Westwood. The victory was the Bruins’ fourth Quadrant 1 victory (third vs. Quadrant 1-A) of the season, placing their résumé inside the nation’s top 40 and ninth in what Bracketology projects to be a 10-bid Big Ten. They’re playing well recently, and their consensus at-large odds are at 96% in the forecast models, meaning the Bruins appear to be tourney-bound.

Next game: at USC (Saturday)


Iowa Hawkeyes

Updated: March 6, 8:08 a.m.

After falling in a tight game to Michigan on Thursday, Iowa has now lost five of its past seven games with the Big Ten tourney approaching. But since three of those losses were to quadrant 1A opponents, the Hawkeyes aren’t in too much danger. Their résumé still sits in the mid-30s nationally — in addition to being top 25 in our average of predictive ratings — and they have a consensus 93% at-large probability. While grabbing the win over Michigan would have potentially elevated them to “lock” status, there aren’t many scenarios under which Iowa would somehow be left out of the bracket at this point.

Next game: at Nebraska (Sunday)


Ohio State Buckeyes

Updated: March 7, 8:02 p.m.

The Buckeyes picked a great time for their second three-game winning streak of the season — first since late November — beating Purdue, Penn State and Indiana in a crucial bubble contest to close out the regular season. They’d been sweating out the bubble for months, with at-large chances hovering around a coin flip, but they’re now at 91%, further solidifying a résumé that’s top 40 in the national rankings (and no worse than ninth in the Big Ten). While not a lock yet, they’ll enter the conference tournament with some momentum.

Next game: Big Ten tournament (March 10-15)

Work to do (1)

Indiana Hoosiers

Updated: March 7, 8:06 p.m.

Indiana’s downward spiral from once-promising tournament odds to big-time bubble trouble continued with Saturday’s loss to Ohio State. Its conditional at-large probability has plummeted down to around 40%, and its résumé now ranks outside the top 50 nationally. If the Big Ten gets 10 NCAA tournament bids, the Hoosiers would deserve the last of those nods over USC — but a nine-bid conference will leave the Hoosiers out in the cold.

Next game: Big Ten tournament (March 10-15)

BIG 12

7.9 expected bids (6.9 at-large)

Locks (6)

Arizona Wildcats
Houston Cougars
Iowa State Cyclones
Texas Tech Red Raiders
Kansas Jayhawks
BYU Cougars

Should be in (2)

UCF Knights

Updated: March 7, 8:54 a.m.

A third straight loss — and sixth in nine games — for UCF, by 15 points at West Virginia in Friday’s regular-season finale, has left the Knights’ tourney fate much more in doubt than it seemed not long ago. Once upon a time, they peaked as high as 96% in the at-large model consensus, but now that number is 76% — barely in “Should Be In” territory. With so many of the Big 12’s expected bids effective “locks,” the conference’s bubble picture really starts with the seventh bid, and UCF still clings to that spot with a No. 34 national ranking in the résumé average. But Cincinnati (No. 52) and TCU (No. 37) have zoomed up the ranks recently, making UCF’s grip on one of the final Big 12 tourney spots no sure thing anymore.

Next game: Big 12 tournament (March 10-14)


TCU Horned Frogs

Updated: March 7, 4:18 p.m.

The Horned Frogs’ case for the Big 12’s final at-large bid was perhaps solidified Saturday with their eighth win in nine games, including over Cincinnati in what might have amounted to an early NCAA tournament play-in. Their consensus at-large chances have now risen to nearly 80%, up from just 10% a few weeks ago, thanks to downing Texas Tech earlier in the week and notching their fifth Quadrant 1 win. It would be surprising if TCU doesn’t hear its name on Selection Sunday.

Next game: Big 12 tournament (March 10-14)

Work to do (1)

Cincinnati Bearcats

Updated: March 7, 4:18 p.m.

The Bearcats’ late-season charge continued with a convincing Quadrant 1 win over BYU on Tuesday for their sixth win in seven games. They are still outside the top 50 in the national résumé average — the rest of the bubble is generally around No. 45 — so the consensus model sets their at-large chances at 30%. At this point, their case heavily relies on signature wins: Iowa State, Kansas and now BYU. But their recent hot streak sets up a big regular-season finale against fellow bubble team TCU.

Next game: Big 12 tournament (March 10-14)

ACC

7.8 expected bids; 6.8 at-large

Locks (4)

Duke Blue Devils
Virginia Cavaliers
North Carolina Tar Heels
Louisville Cardinals

Should be in (3)

Clemson Tigers

Updated: March 7, 2:16 p.m.

After five losses in six games, the Tigers took care of business as heavy favorites over Georgia Tech to close out the regular season on Saturday. It didn’t really change things for them, however, with their consensus at-large chances remaining at 94%. Clemson will end up ranked no worse than seventh in the ACC in résumé average — still high enough in the ACC’s pecking order to feel optimistic about its chances ahead of the league tournament, in what’s looking like an eight-bid conference.

Next game: ACC tournament (March 10-14)


Miami Hurricanes

Updated: March 7, 4:25 p.m.

The Hurricanes were on a roll in ACC play, picking up résumé-boosting victories over North Carolina, NC State, Virginia Tech and SMU, among others — but lost a nail-biter hosting Louisville on Saturday to close out the regular season. It really shouldn’t sting that much, however: Miami’s at-large chances (90%) and national résumé quality ranking (inside top 30) are now well on the right side of the bubble picture within the ACC. The Canes are still in fine shape to make the tournament.

Next game: ACC tournament (March 10-14)


NC State Wolfpack

Updated: March 7, 4:24 p.m.

With six losses in seven games, including blowing an 89% win probability against Stanford on Saturday, NC State’s at-large odds are down to just 80% from their peak of 98% and therefore back in “should be in” territory. The Wolfpack still rank mid-30s nationally in the résumé ratings and no worse than seventh on the résumé list in the ACC, with a big gap to the next-best team, SMU. But for all of their performance in the predictive ratings, where they’re a top-35 team, they now have 12 losses and aren’t making things easy for themselves.

Next game: ACC tournament (March 10-14)

Work to do (3)

SMU Mustangs

Updated: March 7, 4:40 p.m.

The Mustangs sat at 94% in the consensus at-large chances about two weeks ago, but a four-game losing streak at the worst possible time (to Cal, Stanford, Miami and Florida State), coupled with other developments across the bubble, has dropped them to just 39% — a stunning fall from bubble grace. They are now fighting to remain eighth in the ACC’s tournament pecking order — and fighting to make a case that the conference should get eight bids, too. They have a cushion over Cal and Virginia Tech in terms of overall résumé quality, but they’ve lost to the Bears head-to-head, and the Hokies have more high-quality wins. The Mustangs will need to keep building their argument in the conference tournament.

Next game: ACC tournament (March 10-14)


Virginia Tech Hokies

Updated: March 7, 2:04 p.m.

Virginia Tech kept its tournament hopes alive with wins over Wake Forest and Boston College, but its résumé could have used an upset over UVA in the regular-season finale Saturday. That didn’t happen, despite the Hokies pulling even with 11 minutes to play, meaning their consensus at-large chances are still just 17% on the eve of the ACC tourney. They do own a pair of Quadrant 1-A wins and a résumé rating just inside the top 50, so their case isn’t completely without merits — depending on what happens in the next week. But right now, they’re on the outside looking in.

Next game: ACC tournament (March 10-14)


California Golden Bears

Updated: March 7, 6:27 p.m.

On a Saturday when all of the ACC’s other bubble squads lost, the Golden Bears missed a golden opportunity to gain ground in the league when they lost at Wake Forest. Their at-large chances sit at 11%, well behind that of SMU (and still trailing Virginia Tech) despite the Mustangs’ and Hokies’ losses. The Bears sit outside the top 50 nationally in the résumé ranking — borderline bubble territory at best — though they have four Quadrant 1 wins. The bottom of the ACC bubble picture is a mess, but it’s becoming clearer that Cal has the longest at-large odds of the bunch.

Next game: ACC tournament (March 10-14)

BIG EAST

3.1 expected bids (2.1 at-large)


Locks (3)

UConn Huskies
St. John’s Red Storm
Villanova Wildcats

Should be in (0)

None

Work to do (0)

OTHERS

Locks (3)

Gonzaga Bulldogs (West Coast Conference)
Saint Mary’s Gaels (WCC)
Utah State Aggies (Mountain West)

Should be in (2)

Miami (Ohio) RedHawks (MAC)

Updated: March 7. 8:06 a.m.

The MAC hasn’t received multiple bids since 1998-99 — fittingly, the same year Wally Szczerbiak led Miami (Ohio) to the Sweet 16 after knocking off Washington and Utah in the first two rounds. Could history repeat? Miami has been living dangerously recently, with a string of close wins. But in overtime Friday night, it survived a visit to Ohio University to finish the regular season without a loss. It’s true that the RedHawks are outside the top 90 in the predictive ratings and faced just the 303rd-hardest schedule in the nation, making their potential at-large case historically unique. But winning matters! As the sole remaining unbeaten in Division I, it’s difficult to imagine they would be excluded as an at-large selection if they fall in the MAC tournament.

Next game: vs. Massachusetts in the MAC tournament quarterfinal (Thursday)


Saint Louis Billikens (Atlantic 10)

Updated: March 7, 6:06 p.m.

The past couple of weeks have been a roller coaster for the Billikens — they lost to Rhode Island and Dayton, needed a comeback to defeat VCU and narrowly beat Duquesne, then on Saturday lost the regular-season finale to George Mason in a 29-point rout. A great story in their second season with Josh Schertz at the helm, their conditional probability was above 90% in our consensus forecast at one point, but that figure falls to just 76% on the eve of the Atlantic 10 tournament. They’re still borderline top 30 nationally in the résumé rankings, with a pair of Quadrant 1 wins, so they have a good chance to make the field as an at-large team if necessary. (BPI projections favor them to win the conference tournament.) But they’re a bit less certain than earlier in the year.

Next game: Atlantic 10 tournament (March 11-15)

Work to do (5)

Santa Clara Broncos (WCC)

Updated: Feb. 28, 10:37 p.m.

The Santa Clara and Saint Mary’s comparisons will be constant as we debate whether the West Coast Conference could get three bids, which has happened only once in the past 13 seasons. After beating Oregon State to finish the regular season Saturday, the Broncos still have model chances nearly in the 70% range and a top-40 résumé ranking nationally, but their fate appears to hang almost entirely upon what they do in the conference tournament and/or whether the selection committee will send that extra WCC at-large team to the Big Dance.

Next game: WCC tournament quarterfinals (Sunday)


VCU Rams (A-10)

Updated: March 7, 8:12 a.m.

VCU hasn’t made back-to-back NCAA tournaments since the Will Wade era nearly a decade ago, but the forecast models now give it a 60% consensus at-large chance after its win at Dayton on Friday night. The Rams are 2-5 against Quadrant 1 opponents, including two losses to A-10 rival Saint Louis. But they are still right in the middle of bubble territory in overall résumé (low-40s nationally), and they just keep winning — they’ve now won 13 of 14, the sole slip-up coming against the Billikens in a game they led by double digits in the second half. It still remains to be seen if the A-10 will get a second bid, but that has happened in three of five years and VCU is now trending to join Saint Louis in the NCAA field.

Next game: Atlantic 10 tournament (March 11-15)


San Diego State Aztecs (MW)

Updated: March 7, 8:12 a.m.

As the Aztecs seemingly slid out of the bubble picture with losses in four of five games, they recovered some to outlast UNLV in the regular-season finale on Friday. Despite the win, their consensus at-large chances are just 17%, and their No. 54 ranking nationally on the résumé list would put them on the wrong side of the bubble right now. On the positive side, the Mountain West hasn’t sent fewer than three teams to the tournament in five seasons, and New Mexico’s résumé is little better than SDSU’s. The Aztecs are one of the teams most vulnerable to a bid thief during conference tournaments.

Next game: Mountain West tournament (March 11-14)


New Mexico Lobos (MW)

Updated: March 7, 6:32 p.m.

Before Wednesday’s loss to Colorado State, the Lobos had made a strong case to be the Mountain West’s second bid as an at-large (if necessary). But that loss, plus the one Saturday to Utah State, has complicated the MWC bubble picture more than ever. The Lobos’ updated chances (14% conditional at-large odds) once again trail San Diego State’s (17%). Both teams are outside the top 50 of the national résumé ranking, so neither is in good shape ahead of the conference tournament. The Lobos might still own the edge, with one more combined Quadrant 1 and 2 win than the Aztecs, and also recently evened the head-to-head scales. But very little separates them — and the Mountain West is looking like only a two-bid conference.

Next game: Mountain West tournament (March 11-14)


South Florida Bulls (American)

Updated: March 6, 8:28 a.m.

Bubble Watch’s latest newcomer, the Bulls have now won 11 of their past 12 games — including eight straight — after outlasting Memphis on the road Thursday. Their consensus at-large chance remains in the teens, so it’s not clear they’ve done enough compared with the other teams on the bubble. The Bulls are 22-8 overall with a couple of Quadrant 1 wins, and they rank 51st in the national résumé average. They are undeniably on a hot streak, and they’re the BPI’s favorite to win the American tourney (with a 42.8% chance), but Joe Lunardi has the conference down to send only one team to the Big Dance at the moment.

Next game: vs. Charlotte (Sunday)

Glossary of terms

  • Model consensus: A blend of the conditional at-large bid odds found via BartTorvik, TeamRankings, JThom Analytics and ESPN Analytics.

  • Résumé ranking: An average of rankings in strength of record (SOR), NET, KPI and wins above bubble (WAB).

  • Predictive ranking: An average of rankings in the Basketball Power Index (BPI), KenPom ratings (KP), Bart Torvik’s “Barthagorean” ratings, TeamRankings’ power ratings and Sports-Reference’s SRS ratings.

  • Strength of schedule and projected records are according to the BPI.



Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment