Friday, March 6, 2026
SUBSCRIBE for $1
All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign
Home PoliticsThe Truth About The Radical Far Left Heretic Who Just Won The Primary In Texas
Politics

The Truth About The Radical Far Left Heretic Who Just Won The Primary In Texas

by admin7
0 comments


The other day, we eulogized the political career of the great Jasmine Crockett of Texas. She lost her bid to be the Democrats’ nominee in the Senate primary — a race she felt compelled to join because Republicans gerrymandered her congressional district away.

In other words, because Republicans redrew the congressional map, Jasmine Crockett had to choose between running for a totally new congressional seat or running for the Senate. (You can’t run for both seats at the same time.) She chose the Senate and lost. And as a result, her political career is likely over.

As tragic as Jasmine’s defeat is, she was by far the most entertaining member of Congress who can barely speak English. But there’s a bigger story here. Jasmine Crockett’s defeat is part of a major shift in American politics, and it really doesn’t get enough attention. For decades since the Civil Rights Era, Democrats have been allowed to draw — and re-draw — congressional maps in order to boost black representation in Congress. So if a district was 80% white, Democrats could redraw the district, in absurd ways, so that more black people — who overwhelmingly vote Democrat — were included.

That’s what happened in Louisiana, to give just one example. 

Democracy Docket

Source: Democracy Docket

A federal court forced Louisiana to draw a district across the entire length of the state, solely to include more black people. This is what happens in many different states. Essentially, Democrats have been allowed to dilute the white vote, knowing full well that non-white voters tend to side with Democrats. This is cheating, of course. But under the guise of “racial equity,” courts have allowed it.

But that’s ending now. All over the country, because of federal court decisions and Supreme Court rulings, Republicans are being allowed to redraw congressional districts that have been rigged for years. This is called gerrymandering — and yes, Republicans are explicitly drawing the districts in order to maximize their political advantage. There’s nothing unusual about that. Both parties do it. The difference is that, for the first time in 50 years, Democrats don’t get to scream “racism” and stop Republicans from gerrymandering. A bigger Supreme Court ruling on this issue is pending, and if it goes the way we think it will, Democrats stand to lose around two dozen seats in Congress. It’s a very big deal.

But already, the impact is being felt. Jasmine Crockett is done. And the man who defeated her in the Democrat U.S. Senate primary, James Talarico, is now being doubted as a “moderate” Democrat who has a real chance of flipping the state of Texas. No Democrat has won a Senate race in Texas in nearly 50 years, but according to Stephen Colbert and the DNC and MSNBC and everyone else in the mainstream Left, Talarico can do it.

And that’s because, as NBC reminded us yesterday, Talarico is supposedly a moderate candidate who will win over “independents” and non-political voters. He’s so sane and normal and moderate that he’s a “big tent” candidate, we’re told.

Watch: 

Source: NBC NEWS/YouTube.com

This idea — that Talarico is a down-the-middle politician with broad appeal — is everywhere. Leslie Marshall, who’s on Fox News all the time as a political strategist, called Talarico a “more moderate” option. Newsweek describes Talarico as a “rising Democrat and a moderate focused on economic populism and broad voter appeal.”

This is how they sold Talarico to Left-wing Democrats in Texas. Talarico, Democrats were told, was the sane and rational alternative to Jasmine Crockett. So white liberal women cast their votes for Talarico, even as they openly wept about the fact that they were oppressing a strong, independent woman of color.

Watch:

Source: @WesternLensman/X.com

It’s easy for conservatives to be pessimistic right now, as the midterm election season begins. Midterm elections generally don’t go well for the party that controls Congress and the White House. Historically, the incumbent party loses a lot of seats. We all know that. And although the polling looks pretty good for Republicans right now, the expectation is that things will shift towards the Democrats as we get closer to November.

But despite all of that pessimism, I’ll make a prediction: Now that the Democrat Party establishment is seriously trying to run candidates like James Talarico — with the messaging that they’re “normal” and “moderate” and appeal to a “big tent” — it’s very likely that Democrats will not know what hit them in November. If this is the guy that the Democrats’ political operation is going to rally behind, on the theory that he’s totally relatable to the average person in Texas of all places, then this party is probably toast in the midterms. 

James Talarico is not simply a far-Left-wing activist who’s never worked a real job in his life. He’s not simply a creepy-looking heretic and fake “pastor” who pathologically lies to Christians, over and over again, about what the scripture says. James Talarico is all of those things, as we’ll discuss in a moment.

But he’s also completely insane.

He genuinely makes Jasmine Crockett out to be totally normal. Talarico’s rise as a “moderate” was such a con job, and such a flagrant bait-and-switch, that even now, it’s likely that most Democrats don’t realize what just transpired.

So let’s fill them in. We’ll start with this post from James Talarico on May 8, 2020. This is what he tweeted in the context of complaining about alleged cases of police brutality, which were not in fact police brutality. He says that these non-brutality cases are symptoms of the “virus of racism.” And adds this: 

“White skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus. But we spread it wherever we go—through our words, our actions, and our systems. We don’t have to be showing symptoms—like a white hood or a Confederate flag—to be contagious.”

And then he says: The only cure is diagnosing the virus within ourselves and taking dramatic actions to contain the spread. The first small step is proclaiming loudly and unequivocally that #BlackLivesMatter.”

We’ve all become accustomed to hyperbolic and deranged rhetoric from the Left. We all know how often these people will beclown themselves in the service of their ideology. But even with that in mind — this is something special. The Democrat nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas, just a few years ago, declared that white people — simply by virtue of their genetics — spread racism wherever they go, in everything they do. He declared that we are all carriers of a “virus.” He’s saying that white people, in every case, are a plague on society because they are white. And by the same token, he’s saying that it’s impossible for a white person to be victimized because of the color of his skin. White people, according to James Talarico, cannot be discriminated against. They cannot be the victims of hate crimes. It’s not unjust to punish whites for being white, because in his worldview, being white is, itself, a crime against nature.

DailyWire+

Put mildly, this is *not* going to play well in Texas. Nor should it. In a sane Democrat Party, these posts alone would be disqualifying. The African warlords who chant “Kill the Boer” would find James Talarico to be a little too on-the-nose. They’d tell him to tone it down a little. But for Democrats, James Talarico is apparently the best they have to offer. So they’re going to present him as a “moderate,” even though he thinks that tens of millions of Texans have a “virus” because they’re white.

To be clear, this is a much bigger problem for Talarico than just one post. He’s also on the record declaring that “prison is violence” and that we should imagine a world where prisons don’t exist at all.

Watch:

Source: @WesternLensman/X.com

“Prison is violence. … It’s hard to imagine a world without prisons. Just because it’s hard to imagine doesn’t mean you shouldn’t.” 

This is the message that national Democrats have just committed to. This is what they view as “moderate.” They’re trying to suggest that abolishing prisons is a “big tent” policy. Everyone can really get on board with that one. Needless to say, of course, if we abolish the prisons, which is what James wants us to do, James himself will not be living in the neighborhoods where the freed convicts will be settling.

And he has a lot of other big ideas — including the notion that there are “six biological sexes.”

Watch:

Source: @SwipeWright/X.com

He says it’s “obvious” that there are six biological sexes, according to “modern science.” So there’s the arrogance we’re all familiar with from these people. And then he suggests that “modern science” is infallible, so we all need to agree that, effective immediately, there are six biological sexes.

Unfortunately, he doesn’t provide the names for those “six biological sexes.” But as best I can tell, he’s referring to people with chromosomal disorders, like Turner Syndrome, where children are born without the typical XX or XY chromosomes. A child might be born with a single X chromosome, for example. But this doesn’t mean that the child belongs to a new biological sex. What it means is that the child has a developmental abnormality that exists within the established sex binary. And we know that because these developmental abnormalities do not lead to the creation of new reproductive cells or reproductive pathways, which is the definition of a biological sex. If you’re a member of a distinct biological sex, it means your body creates distinct reproductive cells that, when combined with other reproductive cells from another biological sex, create a new organism. Put another way, someone with a developmental disorder might produce eggs, or sperm, or neither (in which case they’d be infertile). But they don’t produce a third type of cell that enables the creation of a new organism. And it’s absurd to suggest otherwise.

What’s important to understand about Talarico — and this might be why some Democrats were fooled into thinking he was a “moderate” — is that he will deliver complete falsehoods with total sincerity. He’ll look you in the eye, very calmly, and lie with impunity. The more you listen, the more unsettling it becomes. For example, watch how he voiced his opposition to a bill that would prevent boys from competing in girl’s sports.

Let’s see exactly why Talarico wants men to compete against women.

Here it is:

@jamestalarico/X.com

Source: @amuse/X.com

Source: @realDailyWire/X.com

Well, there it is.

If you don’t let a boy play in girl’s sports, then you’re responsible if the boy decides to kill himself over it.

And “trans children” are perfect and sacred, which is why we need to pump their bodies full of hormones that sterilize them, and cut apart their bodies.

Oh, and by the way, if you’re not onboard with gender ideology, then you’re not a real Christian because “god is non-binary.” 

If you actually care about the well-being of children, or Christianity — which most Texans do — then both of these statements are not simply wrong. They are appalling. They make normal people react with disgust and revulsion. If you think a child is going to kill himself because he can’t join the girl’s team, the appropriate solution to that problem is not to let him join the girl’s team. It’s to address the profound mental instability that would cause a boy to believe he’s a girl — and to want to die in service of that delusion. And that’s not even getting into the fact that the ACLU’s very own trans-identifying attorney, “Chase Strangio,” has admitted before the Supreme Court that there’s no evidence, anywhere, that “affirming” a child’s subjective sense of “gender” actually reduces suicide rates. So logic, basic morality, and the data all contradict what James Talarico is saying.

And then you get to the part where he calls God “non-binary,” which has to rank pretty high in terms of heresy. Even for James Talarico, he outdid himself here. Imagine taking an incoherent, meaningless, and made-up concept that was created on Tumblr a few years ago for the benefit of delusional narcissists, and saying that God fell for the same propaganda. 

The problem, of course, is that when humans declare that they’re “non-binary,” they aren’t actually changing the fact that they’re human beings with a biological sex. They’re simply declaring, out loud, that they don’t “identify” with their biological sex, and that everyone needs to give them as much attention as possible. That’s what being “non-binary” means, in the Left’s framework. It means absolutely nothing. God, on the other hand, is not a disgruntled, unemployed teenager on Tumblr. The thing about nonbinary is that, if it were a real thing, which it definitely isn’t, it would be a part of the biological system that God created. God transcends the system that he creates. Talarico is basically arguing that God transcends the system by being part of it and subject to it. Which makes no sense. But anyway, non-binary is not part of the system anyway. It’s a made-up concept. Made up by humans, not God. Not the God who created us male and female, and thought that was so important to get across that it’s one of the very first things we’re told in the Bible.

What James Talarico is doing — and he’s not being very subtle about it — is bringing Gnostic heresy to the mainstream. He wants to convince Democrats that they can still consider themselves to be Christians, even as they support the murder, sterilization, and castration of children. He wants to convince Democrats that they can still consider themselves to be Christians, even as they deliberately unleash violent criminals on innocent men, women, and children. He wants to convince Democrats that they can still consider themselves to be Christians, even as they reject every core tenet of Christianity.

The Gnostic element is important to emphasize. Gnostics are heretics who believe that the physical world is evil. They don’t believe that Jesus’ resurrection changed anything. They believe in the total separation of the soul and the body. It’s a heresy that underlies a lot of trans ideology. And it’s what Talarico promotes in his fake sermons.

Watch:

Source: @Protestia/X.com

Source: @Protestia/X.com

It’s hard to know where to begin with this.

The so-called “Gospel of Thomas” — which wasn’t written until the mid-second century, and which wasn’t actually written by Thomas, or anyone who knew Thomas — is a collection of Gnostic heresy. Really, it’s a collection of disconnected and incoherent statements that contradict the actual gospels. And in particular, it stands for the proposition that women can’t enter the kingdom of heaven. That’s the point of the passage he’s quoting. So he’s citing a text that explicitly denies that women can enter the kingdom of heaven in a favorable way. He’s saying we should give credence to this text because he can twist the language around to make it sound like an endorsement of 21st-century gender ideology.

There’s also the incredibly dumb argument that “the Bible never mentions abortion,” as a way of arguing that abortion is somehow compatible with Christianity. I guess there’s supposed to be an appendix to the Bible, where it explicitly lists all of the twenty-million ways you could kill someone. And under James Talarico’s understanding of theology, if your specific method of murder isn’t on the list, then you’re good to go. Because the Bible is silent on the topic of whether or not you’re allowed to drop a piano on someone’s head to kill them, therefore you can drop a piano on someone’s head. That’s the logic. Meanwhile, the Bible does explicitly forbid murder, which covers abortion. And it explicitly states that unborn children are humans created in the womb by God. Not to mention the fact that Jesus Christ Himself began his life on Earth as an unborn child in the womb. So abortion is not only incompatible with the Bible but is in many ways the most incompatible thing you could possibly imagine. 

Just pick up the Bible and read it sometime. Psalm 139 states that God “knitted me together in my mother’s womb.” Luke states that when Mary arrives, Elizabeth’s unborn child “leaped in my womb for joy.” And I could go on.

Talarico uses the same argument to justify his support for same-sex marriage, by the way. He says that the Bible doesn’t talk about same-sex marriage; therefore, it’s permissible. 

As Robert Gagnon (at the Wesley Biblical Seminary) has pointed out in response to Talarico, this is a very superficial and idiotic way to read the scripture.

Here is a snippet of his post: 

The reason why Jesus and biblical writers didn’t talk about “gay marriage” was the same reason why they didn’t talk about marriage with your mother or sibling or child: Any sexual behavior of the sort, whether in a one-time act or in an attempt at a committed relationship was prohibited as an extreme sexual sin abhorrent and detestable to God. … Jesus thought that a male-female prerequisite for marriage was so important that he used it as the foundation for rejecting any sexual bond involving more than two persons (whether concurrent or serial). According to Jesus, the twoness of the sexes, the sexual binary, God’s intentional design of two and only two sexual counterparts, is the basis for limiting the number of persons in a marriage to two. That’s Jesus’ moral logic behind his citation of “male and female he (God) made them.”

What heretics do, in every case, is disregard the teachings of the Bible in favor of grotesque misrepresentations. It’s like a compulsion. And that’s why Talarico keeps doing it.

Watch:

Source: @Protestia/X.com

This is another ridiculous lie. There’s no “debate” that takes place in the Bible, where a woman outwits Jesus in some kind of intellectual argument. There’s a test of faith, where Jesus suggests to his disciples that a Canaanite woman, as a Gentile, wouldn’t benefit from his teachings. And the woman states that she would, in fact, benefit, using a clever turn of phrase in context. And Jesus is happy with her response. It’s a way of demonstrating that his teachings aren’t just for Jews.

But to Talarico, this is a sign that Jesus was “totally owned” by the woman, and it’s a sign that the Bible is really a piece of third-wave feminist literature. He has reduced the Scripture, mangled and perverted it, all for the sake of propping up the modern girlboss fantasy. 

He constantly makes many other misrepresentations along these lines.

Here’s another.

This is James Talarico using the Annunciation of the Virgin Mary to justify abortion.

Watch:

Source: @realDailyWire/X.com

Again, where do you begin with this?

Even if his reading of Luke was correct — which it’s not — it still doesn’t help make his case. Women, in the vast majority of cases, consent to the sexual activity that leads to the conception of their child. So women are providing “consent,” just as he’s claiming Mary did. But Talarico supports abortion at any time, for any reason. He’s not simply advocating for abortion in cases of rape. He’s advocating for abortion on demand.

But the bigger problem, as I’ve already pointed out, is that Talarico is simply making all of this up. The word “consent” does not appear in the Gospel of Luke. The archangel, Gabriel, appears and tells her that, according to God’s will, she’s going to bear God’s son. He doesn’t say, “do you consent?” He tells her what’s happening. And Mary replies, “Let it be to me according to your word.” She’s enthusiastic about bringing a new life — Jesus’ life — into the world.

For James Talarico to twist this passage into a biblical endorsement of child murder — up to and including the moment of birth — is nothing short of demonic. The demonic wing of the Democrat Party isn’t a “wing” anymore. It’s the whole organization. This is nothing less than Satanism. 

The problem Talarico has is that, for an alleged “moderate,” he’s no longer capable of talking like a normal human being. And if you listen to enough of his sermons, that liability becomes very obvious.

Watch:

Source: @Protestia/X.com

“Our neighbors with a uterus became the property of the state . … When I use the word woman, it should not be understood as an exhaustive term, but rather as a lens through which to understand, examine, and interrogate patriarchy.” 

It’s like Chat GPT in a human skin suit. Nothing he’s saying makes sense.

In a matter of seconds, he managed to find several dehumanizing ways to refer to “women.” They’re “neighbors with a uterus.” They’re not really women — they’re a “lens.” 

What “big tent” is going to show up and vote for this guy, exactly? How many “neighbors with penises” and “neighbors with uteruses” will go to the polls to elect this? Nothing about James Talarico comes across as human. That includes this tweet, where he pretends to be happy about receiving the single worst Christmas gift that anyone has ever received (although of course, he didn’t really receive it; he bought it for himself.)

Source: @jamestalarico/X.com

And then there’s the picture of the Tony Fauci action figure with a mask on its face. Which, of course, is exactly what Texans want to see. You know, all of those Texans with their Anthony Fauci action figures at home. They also love hearing that there should be a giant welcome mat on the Southern border.

Watch:

@RNCResearch/X.com

The thing is, we don’t just want to keep out people who “mean to do us harm.” The intention of the foreigners isn’t actually important.

What’s important is that, as a practical matter, our country cannot survive if we import every foreigner who wants to come to the United States. Our welfare system can’t survive it, for one thing. And on top of that, this is *our country*. We’re entitled to run our own country. And if we import millions of foreigners, who will eventually outnumber us, then we’re losing our country. Therefore, we can — and must — exclude foreigners, even if they *do not* wish the United States harm. 

We could go on and on. There’s also the post where he states that “Radicalized white men are the greatest domestic terrorist threat in our country.” There’s the post where he states that, thankfully, he didn’t turn out to be a domestic terrorist because he was “exposed to diversity at a young age and explicitly taught the values of equality, inclusion, and justice.”

But instead of more Talarico posts and videos, we’ll close with this interview featuring Steve Toth, who just defeated Dan Crenshaw in the primary for Texas’ 2nd congressional district. Toth worked with Talarico for many years in the state legislature.

Watch:

Source: @JasonJournoDC/X.com

There’s no reasonable person in the state of Texas who can disagree with that assessment. The moment you get any familiarity with Talarico, it’s very obvious.

And on that point — you have to give the Republicans some credit here. Throughout the entire primary, the Republicans stayed silent as Democrats sold Talarico as a normal guy. Republicans had the opposition research in hand. They knew about all of Talarico’s tweets, videos, and sermons. But they held their fire, so that Democrats would elect Talarico as a “moderate”, without having any idea what they were getting into. Now, as it stands, Democrats are all but certain to lose this race in November.

But as much as I want to gloat over these revelations about Talarico, I simply can’t do so. It’s a very troubling development that this demonic force just received a major party’s nomination to represent one of our most important states in the U.S. Senate. And as much as I’d like to gloat over Jasmine Crockett’s loss — and believe me, I did want to gloat — the satanic theater kid who beat her is somehow 100 times worse in every way. He’s just an absolute depraved evil freak. At least Jasmine was kind of funny because she’s so dumb. But James Talarico is deeply sinister. His goal — and the goal of the Democrat Party in the midterms ahead — is to recast their anti-American and anti-human ideology as fully compatible with Christianity.

It’s not. It never will be. Christianity is the natural enemy of trans ideology. It’s also the natural enemy of Gnostic heresy, abortion, and wanton destruction of human life. Rather than move towards sanity — a move that was desperately needed in the Democrat Party — they’ve decided to double down on these evils, all while claiming to be “moderates.” Democrats spent an enormous amount of time and money boosting Talarico because they see his approach as the future of their party.

They think they can fool the entire country, as they apparently fooled primary voters in Texas on Tuesday.

For the sake of Western civilization, we simply cannot fall for it in November.





Source link

You may also like

Yes, Trump Can Do That With Tariffs But...

US officials say over 30 Iranian ships destroyed...

Court Blocks Florida Gov. DeSantis’s Executive Order Designating...

For the Love of the Game, for the...

State Department announces restored diplomatic relations with Venezuela

Is your position more like Justice Gorsuch in...

Homeland Security Shakeup Creates Major Opening For Deep-Red...

It's a Chaotic Market. Take the Long-Term View

Pete Hegseth says Iran strikes backfired, strengthened US...

The Zizians and the Second Amendment

Leave a Comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

@2021 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign