Agriculture is entering a period of rapid change as farms around the world struggle to balance rising demand with a shrinking workforce. Labor shortages have become one of the most persistent challenges facing growers, processors, and agricultural businesses, and the numbers suggest the pressure is growing.
Demand for agricultural output, meanwhile, continues to move in the opposite direction. The global agricultural commodity market reached an estimated $6.07–6.17 trillion in 2025, rising from roughly $5.77 trillion in 2024, and forecasts suggest it could expand to $11.2 trillion by 2033. That widening gap between supply capability and workforce availability is forcing the industry to rethink how food is grown, processed, and distributed.
Article continues below
Many within agriculture now see robotics and artificial intelligence as potential solutions to these labor constraints.
Freeing up human workers
Rather than replacing workers outright, these technologies are increasingly being viewed as tools that can handle repetitive, hazardous, or labor-intensive tasks, freeing human workers to focus on higher-value responsibilities.
One place actively exploring this future is Lincoln, Nebraska, where the agtech incubator The Combine is supporting startups focused on automation and intelligent systems for agriculture.
Companies emerging from the program are tackling problems across the supply chain, from grain storage and meat processing to poultry monitoring and land management.
Among them are Grain Weevil, which develops robotic grain extraction systems to reduce spoilage and improve safety, and Marble Technologies, which builds robotic solutions for meat packing facilities.
Birdseye Robotics is focused on autonomous systems that monitor poultry barns, while Landoption offers AI-powered tools that help farmers identify new revenue opportunities through conservation and land-use programs.
Brennan Costello, director of The Combine, spoke to me about how these technologies are moving from concept to deployment, and what the next generation of agricultural innovation could mean for farmers facing mounting labor and economic pressures.
- Tell us where are we at when it comes to robots and automation in modern agriculture. How do we distinguish this from say, advanced mechanization, that has been happening since the beginning of this century? (I am assuming we’re not talking about all-rounder humanoid robots but task-specific ones e.g. Renault Calvin).
The honest answer is that we’re in a continuum, and the meaningful question isn’t “is this a robot?” but “how much of the sensing, decision-making, and action has shifted from the human to the machine?”
For me, the clearest distinction is where sensors and AI enter the picture, where the machine begins to perceive its environment and act on it independently.
Agriculture has always adopted mechanization readily. From combine harvesters to GPS-guided planters to variable rate irrigation, these tools made farmers more productive. But they share a common thread: a human is still largely in the driver’s seat.
The machine amplifies the operator; it doesn’t replace the judgment. Robotics changes that relationship. A sprayer that uses computer vision to identify individual weeds and apply herbicide only where needed, like what Greeneye Technology has built, is a robot.
A self-driving feed truck that eliminates a labor position requiring near-24-hour coverage, like what ALA Engineering is developing, is a robot.
What’s easy to miss is just how hard these problems are to solve in agricultural environments. Grain Weevil has spent nearly six years building a robot that operates inside a grain bin. That’s an environment with steel walls that block radio signals, explosive dust, extreme humidity, and high heat.
The robot has to be dust and explosion proof, navigate unpredictable grain surfaces, and do it reliably at commercial scale.
They’re on the verge of full commercial release in 2026. That timeline isn’t a sign of slow progress. It’s a sign of how seriously these teams take building technology that actually works in the real world, not just in a controlled lab.
- Can you pinpoint what exactly has changed over the past 24 months that makes robots a viable alternative to humans? Advances in technology? Significant drop in prices? Long term decline in demographics?
The conditions that are making agricultural robotics viable today have been building for well over a decade. What we’re seeing now is the convergence of several long-developing trends, not a single recent breakthrough.
On the demand side, the driver has always been labor. Specific farm jobs, think operating a feed truck on a near-24-hour cycle, managing a grain bin, working in a poultry house, are difficult, dangerous, and increasingly hard to staff.
That pressure isn’t new. Grain Weevil, for example, was founded in 2020 specifically to address grain bin safety and labor, and even that founding was years in the making. The willingness of farmers to adopt robotics has tracked closely with how acute that labor pain has become in specific operations.
On the supply side, what has genuinely changed is the cost of the underlying hardware. This isn’t unique to agriculture.
As robotics has scaled across manufacturing, logistics, and other industries, the component costs have dropped dramatically. LIDAR is a good example. Sensors that cost $28,000 just a few years ago are now available for a few thousand dollars. That same trend is playing out across motors, cameras, compute, and other core components.
Combine that with years of accumulated farm image and field data that is now providing the foundation for training computer vision and AI models, and you have a supply side that is finally catching up to a demand side that has been waiting for it. The result is more companies able to pursue robotics at lower R&D cost, and more solutions reaching commercial viability.
- What is the future of farming once we take into consideration GMO, AI, robotics, consumer demand, environmental imperatives and market forces? How far are we from a lights-out farm where only robots operate?
The future of farming is maximum efficiency. Since the 1950s, we have steadily increased both productivity and, more recently, input efficiency. Bushels per acre continue to climb while the resources required to produce them are shrinking. Technology is the engine behind that trend, and robotics accelerates it.
The farm of the future isn’t a radical departure from that trajectory. It’s the logical conclusion of it: getting the most out of every acre while preserving the land and environment for long term sustainability. That’s not a pipe dream. It’s where we are headed.
One of the most compelling near-term examples is the shift from chemical to mechanical solutions. Broadcast spraying has been the default for decades, applying herbicide across entire fields regardless of weed pressure.
Greeneye Technology has built a computer vision powered sprayer that identifies individual weeds and sprays only where needed, at speed. That’s a meaningful reduction in chemical inputs, driven entirely by robotics and AI. It’s a preview of how robots will change not just labor on the farm, but the entire input model.
On the lights-out farm question, I’d say it’s the wrong frame for most of agriculture. Farming happens in the real world, with an enormous range of environments, weather, crop conditions, and variables that make full autonomy extraordinarily difficult. In the next decade, the dominant model will still be human-led with AI assistance.
Where a more autonomous approach becomes plausible sooner is in controlled environments like greenhouses, where you can manage the variables. For open field production, I’d put meaningful robot autonomy at 20 to 30 years out.
What we’ll see in the next 10 is AI helping farmers make better decisions faster. That alone will be transformative.
- Is the future of agriculture just Farming-as-a-service then? The land is leased, the robots are leased, the grain are well purchased every year (Monsanto controversy).
Service and rental models for specific technologies are a legitimate and potentially beneficial direction, especially given where farm economics are right now.
Large equipment is extraordinarily expensive, and a per-acre or subscription model for access to a robotics solution could open doors for smaller operators who couldn’t otherwise afford the technology. That’s not a threat to farmers. That’s an opportunity.
The broader FaaS model, where independent farmers are effectively replaced by a fully leased, corporately managed operation, runs into a pretty strong structural reality. Ninety-five percent of farms in the United States are still independently, family-owned operations.
That makeup is a meaningful counterweight to the consolidation scenario the question implies. Farm consolidation is a real and continuing trend, but it hasn’t displaced the family farm as the dominant unit of American agriculture, and I don’t expect robotics alone to change that.
The risk worth watching is technology consolidation, not land consolidation. A small number of large ag OEMs have historically controlled the tools farmers depend on, and that dynamic creates real dependency.
What’s encouraging is the growth of the startup ecosystem. More companies pursuing more solutions means more competition, more pricing innovation, and more alternatives for farmers.
John Deere’s iterations on how to price see and spray technology is a good example of the market forcing flexibility. As we move forward, the companies that figure out business models that work for farmers, not just for their own balance sheets, will be the ones that win. That balance is still being worked out, and maintaining flexibility on both sides is critical.
- Perhaps more importantly then, what does the farmer of the future look like (at least in the US)? Will they be as versatile or just fleet technicians?
The farmer of the future looks like the farmers we work with today, just better equipped. Technology, and robotics in particular, is going to increase efficiency and improve decision making for those willing to embrace it.
The operators who lean into these tools will have better visibility into their operations, reduce their input costs, and improve their bottom line. That’s not a radical transformation of what farming is. It’s a continuation of what good farmers have always done, finding every edge they can to be more productive and more sustainable.
From our work with Nebraska producers, the sentiment is more excitement than anxiety. Nebraska has a long history of early adopter farmers, and that culture is still alive. What we consistently hear is that farmers are eager when technology solves a real problem on their operation.
The hesitation isn’t resistance to technology. It’s a disciplined focus on ROI. In a tight farm economy, every new tool has to prove itself. That’s healthy, and it’s actually pushing developers to build better, more practical solutions.
On the “fleet technician” framing, I’d push back on that. In the near term, human led and AI assisted will remain the dominant model.
What I think we’ll eventually see is a farmer overseeing several AI driven platforms handling different practices across the operation, planting, spraying, monitoring, harvesting, each operating with increasing autonomy.
The farmer isn’t disappearing from that picture. They’re moving up the stack, from operator to strategic decision maker, directing where the operation goes and how these tools work together.
That’s not a lesser role. For the farmers who embrace it, it’s a more powerful one.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
